The shameful burial place of the Antichrist

Another somewhat common idea that I have seen passed around prophecy circles for years is the notion that the “Gog” of Ezekiel 38,39 cannot be the Antichrist because Gog receives a burial and Antichrist does not. This idea comes from a surface reading of the two following passages:

But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, [and as] the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet. Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, [and] slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned. Isaiah 14:19,10

And it shall come to pass in that day, [that] I will give unto Gog a place there of graves in Israel, the valley of the passengers on the east of the sea: and it shall stop the [noses] of the passengers: and there shall they bury Gog and all his multitude: and they shall call [it] The valley of Hamongog. Ezekiel 38:11

So, it is clear that Gog will be buried. But is Isaiah really claiming that the Antichrist will never be buried? Is there really a conflict here? Not at all. In order to understand what this passage is saying, one must simply read the whole context.

So, lets look briefly at Isaiah 14: It is a poetic / prophetic dirge against the King of Babylon / Assyrian / Antichrist.

The Antichrist first claims that he would make his throne on the Mountain of God (Ie. the Temple Mount, where God’s Temple or “seat” was) but instead, God declares that he would find his “seat” on the side of the pit of hell instead:

For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north… Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. Isaiah 14:13, 15

This final resting place in hell is then contrasted with his actual physical burial that would be one of utter shame. In ancient times, wealthy families shared a family sepulchre. These were cave-like burial places. Bodies were given their proper place along the sides of the sepulchre. Not entirely unlike a modern mausoleum. In this passage, shame is being cast upon the Antichrist. God informs the Antichrist that unlike the other kings of the earth, the Antichrist will not be buried in his family or royal sepulchre, but will instead be buried in a mere pit and that his only clothing would be other dead bodies. It is not saying that he will never be put into the ground. Instead it is simply showing the nature of his shameful death. He will never experience a proper burial in a family or royal sepulchre. Instead of dying like royalty (as he has said in his heart that he is like the most high), he will be treated like dung with the rest of those who are slain.

All the kings of the nations, [even] all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house. Isaiah 14:18

But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, [and as] the raiment (his clothing will consist) of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet. Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, [and] slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned. Isaiah 14:19,10

He is buried, not in a sepulchre, but rather in a common pit along with other bodies in a mass unmarked grave. His only covering (raiment) is other dead bodies that surround him.

In conclusion, any claim that Gog and the Antichrist must be two different individuals based on the above argument is seen to be based on improper exegesis and a surface reading that fails to read the full context of the passage. For further study, I highly recommend Alec Motyer’s commentary on Isaiah.

3 Comments
  • Paul
    Posted at 12:51h, 01 June

    Joel,
    Maybe it is not so clear in Isiah 14 but it seems pretty clear to me in Ezekiel 39:11 that Gog is BURIED in the land of Israel. This is completely contrary to Rev 19:20 where the antichrist is tossed into the lake of fire with no burial in land necessary. Honestly, I would prefer to see Gog as Antichrist and the Gog War as Armageddon, but I’m afraid it is not clear enough for me to agree to both of these positions. I will keep reading with an open mind always looking for truth. Thank you for your perseverance in scripture study.
    TM

  • Joel
    Posted at 19:05h, 01 June

    Paul,

    Isaiah 14 makes it clear that the Antichrist dies and is buried. He simply is not buried in his royal sepulcher. Instead he is buried in a mass grave and covered by corpses. 2 Thess. also is clear that Jesus will slay the AC with the breath of his mouth and the spindlier of His coming. Slay means to kill, no? Thus we must see the reference to the AC being cast alive into hell as either referring to a resurrection unto judgment after the slaying, or is essentially regarding his soul being cast alive into hell. Anything else is simply contradictory.

    Blessings,
    Joel

  • TM
    Posted at 14:28h, 11 June

    Joel,

    Ok, I see the point you are making here. It does make sense if you see the “body” is being buried while the “soul” is being transported to some place of torments awaiting further instruction.

    Btw, I always interpreted Isaiah 14 as being the devil only, but I can see why you think it has a dual purpose (antichrist too, since he is a man and Satan obviously isn’t).

    Ok, I can live with this interpretation. Tto move on. Thanks again.

    Tm

Post A Comment