The following article is the first in a series featured on the Roman Catholic site Catholic Online (www.catholic.com). I have found all of Mr. Greenwell’s articles to be trenchant, compassionate and yet filled with conviction.
We have seen in our prior series entitled “The Heart’s Witness Against Muhammad” how, in his moral fruits, Muhammad can be identified as a false prophet. We will see in this series entitled “The Antichrist in Muhammad” how, in his doctrinal fruits, Muhammad can also be identified as a false prophet twice over. This series is nothing less than an effort to be responsive to the Lord’s warnings regarding false prophets..
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX (Catholic Online) – In our earlier series on Muhammad entitled “The Heart’s Witness Against Muhammad,” we looked at Muhammad’s claim to be a prophet of God from the perspective of his claim to be the perfect exemplar of humanity, al-insan al-kamil, the best of all mankind, khair ul-bashar, and the perfect model of conduct, uswa hasana.
Muhammad’s acts as contained in the earliest Muslim biographies of Muhammad were then compared to the natural moral law, a universal law of morality that binds all men, including supposed prophets. It was quite readily seen that the claim–supposedly to have been revealed–that Muhammad was the best of all mankind is unsupportable by reason. Reason alone should tell you that Muhammad’s claims–and his supposed revelations in the Qur’an–are not reasonably trustworthy.
Indeed, I think we can reasonably take any Catholic saint at random, compare his or her life to Muhammad, and Muhammad would, in each and every instance, lose the test. Muhammad is morally inferior to any Catholic saint, and, what is more, morally inferior even to any reasonably pious and imperfect Catholic who has not yet escaped the tyranny of venial sins or lesser imperfections.
What is more striking is that each and every one of these Catholic saints or pious Catholics would immediately confess that their moral integrity pales next to the perfect integrity of the human nature of Jesus which was joined to God the Son. None–even St. Francis of Assisi–would claim to be the perfect exemplar of humanity, the best of all mankind, the perfect model of conduct.
Looked at in this manner, we see that Muhammad’s claim is not only unsupportable, but unbelievably pretentious: indeed, even risible. It is perhaps for this reason that Muhammad found so many of his contemporaries lampooning him, and so many Jews and Christians rejecting him.
In his Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 7:15-23), Jesus warned us of false prophets, and enjoined upon us the obligation to be vigilant.
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but underneath are ravenous wolves. By their fruits you will know them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? Just so, every good tree bears good fruit, and a rotten tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a rotten tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire. So by their fruits you will know them.”
We have seen how, in his moral fruits, Muhammad can be identified as a false prophet. We will see in this series how, in his doctrinal fruits, Muhammad can also be identified as a false prophet twice over. This series is nothing less than an effort to be responsive to the Lord’s warnings.
Therefore, in this next series of articles entitled “The Antichrist in Muhammad,” we will look at Muhammad from the perspective of the Faith. In particular, we will compare the teachings of Muhammad and his Qur’an regarding Jesus to the Catholic Church’s claims regarding Jesus.
Jesus (in Arabic, ‘Isa) appears in the Qur’an and its supposed revelations, is referred to in generally positive terms, but the little that the Qur’an gives to Jesus with one hand pales compared to what it takes away from Jesus with the other hand.
It may be said that what a Catholic or any Christian holds to be the most significant about Jesus is denied of Jesus by Muhammad. The Jesus of the Qur’an is spiritually and doctrinally emasculated.
So much does the Qur’an detract from Jesus and the Catholic Church’s understanding of Jesus, that, by the end of this series, it will be apparent to any reasonable inquirer that Muhammad’s teachings contained in the Qur’an and the Sunna are deeply anti-Catholic, and, more broadly, deeply anti-Christian. Muhammad’s teachings and the teachings in the Qur’an offend the understanding of Christ not only of the Catholic Church, but also the Orthodox Church and almost all mainline Protestant churches and ecclesial communions.
In this initial article, we ought to explain our title to the series, which some might consider a little offensive. The best place to begin in understanding the choice of title is with the Catholic understanding of the “Antichrist.” Accordingly, we will begin this series with a short review of the Scriptural, Patristic, and traditional teachings on the Antichrist.
Christ comes from the Greek word, Christos, which is the equivalent to the Hebrew word Mashiach (usually transliterated as Messiah), meaning anointed one. In Arabic, the word for Messiah is Masih. Anti, in Greek, is a prefix meaning “against” or “opposed to.” So the term antichrist means “opposed to Christ.”
The term antichrist is Scriptural. We find the term used in St. John’s epistles. We should turn, therefore, to those epistles to understand its meaning.
The teaching of the Antichrist appears clearly to have been part of the oral teachings of the Apostles, and so are part and parcel of the Gospel. “[Y]ou heard,” St. John says referring to the Apostolic teaching, “that the antichrist was coming, so now many antichrists have appeared.” (1 John 2:18).
In the same epistle, St. John elaborates that “every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus does not belong to God. This is the spirit of the antichrist that, as you heard, is to come, but in fact is already in the world.” (1 John 4:3)
It is apparent that the Apostle John distinguishes between the one Antichrist (which appears to be the subject of St. Paul’s letter to the Thessalonians (2 Thess. 3:7-10) and is referred to as the “man of sin”) and which St. John identifies with a definite article, and then many antichrists, so-called forerunners of the Antichrist, which St. John identifies indefinitively and in the plural. It is in this latter sense that we use the term antichrist in the title.
In his epistles, St. John gives us some simple tests to help us distinguish the Antichrist, and therefore also those who participate in the Antichrist’s spirit, the antichrists who are the Antichrist’s forerunners:
“Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ, whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the Antichrist.” (1 John 2:22)
“[T]hose who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh; such is the deceitful one and the Antichrist.” (2 John 7)
These words obviously meant something. In his letter to Pope Damasus I (376 A.D.), St. Jerome neatly summarized the Scriptural teaching as found in St. John’s epistles: “He that is not of Christ is of Antichrist.”
This concept is given a little more breadth by St. Leo the Great, who, in his letter to Leo Augustus (No. 156), referred to anyone who denied the teachings of an infallible Church Council, in particular that of Chalcedon, was an antichrist. Presumably, that term would apply to any one who teaches in a manner inconsistent with any infallible council of the Catholic Church.
St. John of Damascus (645-749 A.D.), in his famous treatise on the faith, De fide orthodoxa, acknowledged that many antichrists were “bound to come” in addition to the final Antichrist, and that any one of many expected antichrists can be identified by the fact that he “confesses not that the Son of God came in the flesh and is perfect God and became perfect man, after being God.”
St. John of Damascus, in fact, identifies Muhammad as a “pseudo-prophet,” pseudoprophetes, and identifies him, or at least Islam (which he calls the heresy of the Ishmaelites), as “forerunner of the Antichrist,” prodromos tou Antichristou.
Even more forthrightly, we might point to Peter the Venerable (1092-1156 A.D.), who, in the prologue of his translation of the Qur’an into Latin, referred to Muhammad as the maximal precursor of the Antichrist and the elect disciple of the devil: maximus precursor Antichristi et electus discipulus diaboli Mahumet.
What this series will do, then, is to take some of the fundamental teachings of the Catholic Church regarding Jesus which we know, by the certainty of Faith, are revealed by God. This will include Jesus’ identity as the Son of God (which necessarily implicates the Fatherhood of God, and the doctrine of the Trinity), the Incarnation (which also involves the role of Mary as the Mother of God), Christ’s message and his mission (which implicates the Gospels and the doctrine of Grace), Jesus’ crucifixion and his atoning death (which necessarily touches upon the notion of Original Sin, Atonement, and mankind’s Redemption), the gift of the Holy Spirit, the role of the Church, and Christ’s Second Coming.
We will then take these dogmas–truths revealed by God and which, from a Catholic perspective, cannot be in error–and compare the teachings of the Muhammad in the Sunna (traditions or reports) and the revelations of the Qur’an to them. To the extent Islamic teachings, founded on Muhammad’s teachings and the Qur’an, contradict the teachings of the Catholic Church, one can be assured that the spirit underlying them is not the Holy Spirit, not the Spirit of Christ (Rom. 8:9), but the unholy spirit of the Antichrist.
—–
Andrew M. Greenwell is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas, practicing in Corpus Christi, Texas. He is married with three children. He maintains a blog entirely devoted to the natural law called Lex Christianorum. You can contact Andrew at [email protected].
16 Responses
I have no doubt as to the sincerity of Mr. Greenwell and I agree with him on most points. However I take issue with the fact that, yes, while the Saints (Apostles, early church leaders) were not perfect and never claimed they were, the Catholic Church does believe that their Pope, who was born a normal man who is of a fallen nature, is now perfect and is incapable of sinning. The Pope could, at least in theory, rape a women or child, and it would not be a sin in the eyes of the Catholic church, because the Pope is no able to sin since he is the Vicar of Christ. In other words, the Catholics believe the exact same thing Muslims believe about their Muhammad, a perfect example of holiness. Mr. Greenwell points out that that Muhammad was a man born of a fallen nature and that despite this, Muhammad is viewed by Muslims as the perfect example of holiness.
I would argue that the Catholics due exactly the same as the Muslims do. Muslims look to Muhammed as the example. Looks like a case of pointing the finger with 3 pointing back at you.
Hi Ron,
I was concerned that merely posting an article by a Roman Catholic would cause this to become about Catholicism. There is a time and place to discuss or even debate with Roman Catholics concerning issues with which we as Protestants disagree, however, I would prefer that this not be the place for this.
I would also remind everyone that the majority of Christians who are now being persecuted and martyred for their faith in Messiah in the nations of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and throughout the Middle East are Catholic. While holding to the various issues with which I disagree with Roman Catholicism, I stand with my brothers and sisters who are giving their lives for Jesus there.
And for what it is worth, it is not true that Roman Catholicism view any Pope as sinless. The Roman Catholic Catechism does espouse the doctrine that Pope is infallible when he speaks ex cathedra, but in no way does this infer that official Catholic doctrine views any Pope as sinless. Many were quite the opposite and I think most Catholics would acknowledge this as well.
Blessings
Whether we use the term, Mahdi, or Anti-Christ, we are dealing with a dangerous individual with cat like geopolitical reflexes.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/official-iraqi-president-jalal-talabani-is-flown-to-germany-for-more-treatment-after-stroke/2012/12/20/e78bf4da-4a75-11e2-8af9-9b50cb4605a7_story.html no doubt will play into the hands of the Antichrist, because instability is a tool in the hands of one with a plan.
For there is too much to the Anti-Christ, for him to leave everything to “flying by the seat of your pants”.
Concerning the antichrist being a Mohammaden ;Gog of Magog(Turkey): A sermon on Answers in Revelation said that “his seat”/throne in Rev. 13:2 refers to the dragon’s seat, power etc. not antichrists. Another words, the dragon gave him his- the dragon’s seat , power etc., to the beast. And that seat is in Turkey Rev. 2:13. Thus Turkey is the HQ. -MAGOG! I always read it as -“the dragon gave him his(the beast’s) power. But never looked at it as his as in the dragon’s. The message didn’t connect it to Rev. 2:13. I did. -Iron sharpens iron. -Charles
I have always been curious as to why Jesus was not more of a spectacular figure west of Israel and Syria. The apostles went to Damascus, but why did they fail from Damscus to Baghdad to Kabul but succeed in Rome and Constantinople? Did they ever get to India?
It has always bothered me how easily Mohammed was able to manipulate the many theories of Jesus which were predominant by 600ad and claim 1. Christ never existed, 2. If he did exist, he was not the Son of God or 3. He was never resurrected or survived? Yet, in the Hadiths, Christ actually descends from Heaven to slaughter all non muslims and bow before the Mahdi!!!
The Quran depicts Mohamed as questioning himself, but then tells of Mohammed’s raiding parties, the murder of Jews and hatred toward Christianity all under the name of Alla! It is obvious that Christ was not well known during Mohammed’s time in the Middle East- Jesus’ back yard! It is also obvious that Mohammed himself was confused as to who Christ was? What happened between Christ’s resurrection and 626 ad?
In chapter 76 of “God’s war on terror” you have co-authored you point out that the majority of the soldiers that destroyed Jerusalem were Arabs,Syrians and Turks.
Alfred Edersheim in his book “The life and times of Jesus the Messiah” points out in footnote 35 ,book 5 chapter 14 that “..The soldiers (that scourged our Lord Jesus ) were, as mostly in the provinces, chiefly provincials – in this case probably Syrians.They were all the more bitterly hostile to the Jews..”
Not only was the physical temple razed by them in AD 70, but our Lord Jeus was scourged and likely crucified by the same provincials as well.
Blessings
RLitzen, from the time of the Apostles, to 626 AD, you had quite the history.
The Apostle Thomas, according to tradition, made it to India, and you had early heterodox making their way to China, (for Marco Polo encountered them).
Between wars that were fought between the eastern part of the Roman Empire, and the Parthians, plus the Sassanids – the Christian message was operating in circumstances that left room for improvement.
I came across this, http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/12/21/lawrence-solomon-worlds-most-populous-faith/ and I am thinking that there are more variables involved as to why Islam is not to be taken for granted, other than numbers.
Good article! Without excusing some of the things the Roman Catholic Church has done in the past and believes as doctrine, there are plenty of Catholics who love Jesus! They may not have it all figured out but hey, none of us really do. You can be right in your heart and wrong in your head…
I think it’s also important to note that 1 John 2:22 clearly says that the Antichrist denies “The Father and the Son”, it denies the Fatherhood of God and the Sonship of Christ. In other words, the religion of Antichrist will deny the Trinity. Catholics don’t do this at all… However, Muhammad and his religion as put forth in this article absolutely do…
Thank you, David W. Lincoln.
That’s right. There can be no other than muhammad figure that could be the Antichrist. We can prove it. After my book entitled “Proof Muhammad is the antichrist” is completed then we can all look about it.
LET WE INTRODUCE OUR MISSION TO YOU.
Have a Nice Day
We are soldiers of Christ. We want to win the souls of the entire world for Jesus Christ. Our main target is to win the souls of Muslims around the world. We want to convert more than one hundred thousand Muslims from Islam. Because Islam is the most evil religion in the world since the world was created.
Muhammad is the prophesied Antichrist in Revelation 13. Satan through Muhammad ibn Abd-Allah and Islam will fight against Israel and Christians around the world and all of them have been written in the Bible.
We can prove that Allah is certainly not the LORD made the heavens and the earth. Because Allah SWT is an idiot. We can also prove that Muhammad SAW is the antichrist.
So we challenged the Muslims all over the world to argue and prove us wrong. If successful then we will give 1 million US dollar prize.
The requirements to get a prize money of 1 million U.S. dollar are as follows:
1. Buy our book entitled “Allah SWT idiot proof” and “Proof muhammad is the Antichrist”.
2. Argue and prove that we were wrong.
3. You may use any means to deny that Allah SWT is not an idiot.
4. To prove that there are other figures to be the antichrist then you should make a list of more data than we’ve made in the book “Proof muhammad is the Antichrist”. Who gives more data is then he/she is the winner.
5. Submit your rebuttal and argument to comments on this blog or to “Steiner Budiman” wall on facebook https://www.facebook.com/steiner.budiman.31 or send via email to [email protected]
6. The argument you made in Indonesian or English.
7. Your argument must be accompanied by strong arguments based on the Koran and/or the Bible.
8. If you can prove us wrong then the money of 1 million U.S. dollars will be yours. Ha …. 7x
9. So wait no more. Immediately give your arguments so that you will get the prize.
10. If you are not able to meet the challenges of our then you should investigate to learn the Koran.
11. Use your brain to think. Allah SWT surely only a false God. So now an apostate from Islam. Ha …. 7x
The question now is why we dare to promise prize money of 1 million American dollars?
1. We know that God was an idiot and can not be denied anymore. Ha … 7x
2. We can attest that the Antichrist was Muhammad. We can prove that only Muhammad who could be the Antichrist. Ha … 7x Muhammad is the only man in the world whose ambition to rival even exceeding Jesus in all things. Ha … 7x
Believe us. Muhammad is the Antichrist prophesied in the Bible for thousands of years. Most of the Bible is prophecy about Jesus Christ. While the second most prophecy is about antichrist.
Unfortunately prophecy about false prophets, false apostles, antichrist fulfilled by Muhammad. Ha … 7x
You can see a small part of the prophecy is fulfilled by
muhammad in :
book : Proof muhammad is the Antichrist. http://antikrismuhammad.blogspot.com/2013/11/book-proof-muhammad-is-antichrist_4119.html
Currently the book has not been completed. But you can see the article that discusses this matter in
ANTIKRIS = MUHAMMAD http://antikrismuhammad.blogspot.com/2012/01/antikris-muhammad.html
Your Heart is Beating 1 times per second!
JESUS LOVES ALL OF MUSLIMS.
Here’s a list of ebooks published by us:
English Version.
1. There is evidence evil curse in polygamy. The book has been created. You can buy it on Google Play, kobo.com and here.
2. Proof muhammad is the Antichrist.
3. Biblical evidence has been revised.
4. Allah SWT idiot proof.
5. Science in the bible.
6. Jesus is the only Savior of the world.
7. Evidence of Jesus Christ is Yahweh.
8. Jesus in the Trinity is One God.
9. Israel proof Yahweh is the creator of the universe.
10. The truth about the Koran.
11. Islam ( Invisible Satan Leader Among Muslims ).
12. Who is actually Allah SWT ?
13. Allah SWT is not God but the devil.
Indonesian version.
1. Bukti ada kutukan jahat dalam poligami. The book has been created. You can buy it here.
2. Bukti Alkitab telah direvisi.
3. Bukti Muhammad adalah Antikris.
4. Bukti Allah SWT idiot.
5. Bukti Yesus Kristus adalah Yahwe.
6. Negara Israel bukti Yahwe adalah pencipta Alam Semesta.
7. Yesus dalam Tritunggal yang Esa.
8. Yesus adalah satu-satunya Juruselamat Dunia.
9. Sains dalam Alkitab.
10. Kebenaran tentang Alquran.
11. ISLAM ( Ikut Setan Lewat Ajaran Muhammad ).
12. Siapakah sebenarnya Allah SWT ?
13. Allah SWT bukan Tuhan melainkan setan.
Title of ebook may change at any time with or without prior notice.
All our ebooks the same price :
1. US$ 8.88 English Version.
2. Rp. 30.000,- Indonesian version.
Prices are subject to change at any time, with or without prior notice.
The price difference is due transfer from outside Indonesia will be charged U.S. $ 5.00 administrative fee by the bank.
If you are happy with our books, tell a friend, you are not satisfied let us know.
PURCHASE MONEY TRANSFER eBOOKS TO:
Richard Nata
Bank Central Asia, Tbk, Indonesia
002-157-6394
AFTER THAT SEND EMAIL WITH PROOF OF TRANSFER TO [email protected]
OR SMS TO 62-8889910822 (SMS ONLY, NO PHONE CALL).
Do not forget, tell what books you buy from us.
This is our work plan.
Within a year makes at least two ebooks. Because it is made in two languages, Indonesian and English then completed a year at least four ebooks.
Buy now our ebooks to get a cheaper price.
Buy all Indonesian edition ebooks (12 ebooks) at a price of Rp. 250.000, –
Buy all the English editions of the ebook (12 ebooks) at a price of U.S. $ 50.00
Buy all editions Indonesian and English (24 ebooks) at a price of US$ 60.00
Prices are subject to change at any time, with or without prior notice.
Buy my books. Okay ? ha…7x
Let me be full time spreading the Gospel.
So exalted and glorious NAME OF JESUS ALL OVER THE EARTH. HA…7X
Philippians {2:5} Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
{2:6} Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
{2:7} But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and
was made in the likeness of men:
{2:8} And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient
unto death, even the death of the cross.
{2:9} Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name:
{2:10} That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of [things] in heaven, and
[things] in earth, and [things] under the earth;
{2:11} And [that] every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ [is] Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
Your article is very useful for me in the publishing and marketing my books.
Buy our ebooks here and get 1 million U.S. dollar prize. http://angel-publisher.blogspot.com/2013/11/buy-our-ebooks-here-and-get-1-million.html
thank you.
LORD JESUS BLESS YOU.
AMEN
A great work for.Jesus, indeed!!!
The only way to understand and prove for sure that Muhammad is the anti-Christ is to be able to understand the Old Testament (Jewish Bible) in such a manner that you understand Revelation. That takes you out of the mainstream religions and interpretations of the Old Testament and would put yourself at odds with the entire religious community. You have to be able to put aside all you know and think you know. But he is and it can be proven.