The Dangers of Dominionism

Joel Richardson

What any Christian believes concerning the futureشheir eschatologyءbsolutely determines their message and their mission. Likewise, what one believes concerning the nature of the Kingdom of God will also determine their message and their mission.

If we believe that the Kingdom of God is a literal, future kingdom (Premillennialism) then our message and life mission will revolve around pointing others to this future reality. If however, we believe that the Kingdom of God is now, then our message and mission becomes one of actualizing or appropriating that Kingdom and seeking its triumph here and now. The distinction between these two eschatological world-views is dramatic.

I am of the firm conviction that it is only through the theological framework of Historical / Classic / Apostolic Premillennialism that one can truly follow Jesus in the manner that He proscribed in the New Testament.

I am also of the firm conviction that Dominion theology fundamentally undermines both Christian theology and practice, and is responsible for some of the greatest failures of the Church historically.

Christian Dominionism, alternately called Post-Millennialism, Kingdom Now theology, Theonomy, or Christian Reconstructionism is very popular in many quarters of the Charismatic Movement and is gaining influence in many mainstream Evangelical churches as well.

Christian Dominionism holds that the primary mission of the Church is to Christianize the world, literally taking over the whole earth for Jesus. Dominionism holds that this is the mandate and destiny of the Church rather than of Christ Himself at the time of His return.

In recent years, something known as “The Seven Mountain Prophecy” has gained a broad following among many charismatics. This “prophecy” holds that God is calling the Church to conquer the following seven spheres of influence: Family, religion, education, entertainment, media economy, and finally the government.

Christian Dominionists often interpret Jesus’ commandment to “go into all the world and make disciples of all nations” in a way similar to the recent American Neo-conservative program of spreading democracy and nation building. Many Dominionists are less focused on good old fashioned evangelism and more focused on the next election. When the primary emphasis of Christian change is directed toward law and government, the change is primarily an external one, enforced from without.

Premillennialists on the other hand, view Jesus’ commandment to “make disciples of all nations” as speaking simply of making disciples of individuals from all nations. This is a change that begins internally, reaching one heart at a time, ultimately changing society and culture from within.

Christian Dominionism is rooted in a dualistic Greek-philosophical influenced worldview rather than a holistic Hebraic-Biblical worldview. When one embraces the dualistic Greek-philosophical worldview, they will either overly focus on conquering this world (as Dominionism does) or escaping to heaven (as Pre-Trib Rapture Dispensational Premillennialism does). Classic Premillennialism fixes its hope not in this present world, nor in an eternal immaterial heavenly state, rather in the day when heaven and earth become one under the headship of Christ. Biblical hope has always been fixed on the resurrection of the righteous dead and the redemption of all creation.

The danger of Dominionist theology is in its emphasis on taking over the earth for Jesus. This may sound good to some, but once this is viewed as the mission of the Church, rather than the mission of Jesus at the time of His return, then the mandate of dominion must also logically extend to every facet of government, law, and even the military. Historically, whenever the Church has achieved this level of complete control, the result has always been catastrophic.

The Dominionist idea that the Church is the embodiment of God’s Kingdom in the earth logically leads to the idea that the Church is the executor of God’s justice in the earth. The military becomes the means by which the Church Triumphant attains victory.

Simply stated, Dominionism is the way of Islam, not genuine Christianity. The genuine gospel has always called Christians to imitate their master who Himself suffered martyrdom out of love even for His enemies. The cross has always been the ultimate expression of who God is, and how we are to follow Him. Jesus is our model, not Muhammad.

Norway’s terrorist, Ander’s Breivik doesn’t understand the difference.

Nor did the crusader Church. Rather than embracing the cross and extending God’s offer of mercy to all mankind, (even to the point of martyrdom), instead the crusader Church guided by Dominionist theology, painted the sign of the cross onto their shields as they went forward to conquer the world.

Anders Breivik modeled himself after the Dominionist Christian crusaders. Not surprisingly, the first page of his manifesto prominently features the red crusader cross and the YouTube video summary of his manifesto that he created is filled with images of medieval Christian knights bearing the same crusader cross.

Of course Anders Breivik ran rough shod over numerous fundamental commandments of both the Old and New Testaments, but it is clear that among his varied mixture of beliefs, he is in lock step with many elements of the ideology of Christian Dominionism.

Simply stated, if Breivik were truly following the teachings of Jesus, he could not have committed this atrocity. According to the Premillennialist worldview, Christians are not to cling to this world, rather we are to embrace a “pilgrim” or “stranger” identity in the midst of this present system. Of course, Christians are to exert a positive influence in this world as “salt” or “light”, as evangelists, heralds and ambassadors, but this is a far cry from actually seeking to conquer it.

For the early Premillennialist Church, the pinnacle of Christian expression was martyrdom: laying down one’s life for the salvation of unbelievers, not in order to conquer them. Within the Premillennialist worldview, martyrdom is the ultimate victory and the ultimate expression of imitating Jesus. Within the triumphalist Dominionist theological framework, martyrdom is at best a temporary setback.

Because the Premillennialist’s ultimate hope is the physical resurrection of the body and the coming Kingdom of God on the earth, fearlessly losing one’s life for the gospel is the ultimate expression of faith in that future reality.

In reading Anders Breivik’s writings, it is clear he was deeply troubled by the storm clouds brewing over Europe. While his response was clearly demonic, his concerns regarding the future of Europe are legitimate. The demographics don’t lie. But the genuinely Christian response to such looming darkness is found only in the example of Jesus. Even as Jesus Himself overcame this world through martyrdom, so also does the Bible inform Christians that they will also overcome the final onslaught of the devil through martyrdom:

I beheld, and the same horn [the Antichrist] made war with the saints, and prevailed against them… And he… shall wear out the saints of the most High… and they shall be given into his hand… ؄aniel 7:21,25

And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. ؒevelation 13:7

And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death. ؒevelation 12:11

Anders Breivik’s may have called himself a Christian but his worldview was the antithesis of what Jesus taught and modeled. Christians of all stripes will rightly renounce Breivik’s actions without reservation. But if the Church hopes to genuinely follow Jesus and overcome the very dark days ahead, it must with one voice renounce the theological worldview of Dominionism and return whole-heartedly to the Premillennial worldview and the early Church theology of martyrdom.

Below is a brief run down of the spectrum of Christian engagement and how it is related to the eschatologies of Premillennialism and Post-Millennialism / Dominionism:

Engagement Spectrum

Abandonment Premillennialism (Strictly missional, evangelistic. Completely pilgrim, disengaged, passive, fatalistic approach to culture, society, world). (Dispenational Premillennialism)

Engaged Premillennialism (Primarily missional, evangelistic. Maintains a balance between pilgrim, steward and ambassador identities. Actively involved in influencing an inherently adversarial culture, society, world as evangelists, salt, light, stewards, ambassadors) (Historical, Classic or Apostolic Premillennilaism)

The slippery slope of Dominionism:

Spiritual Dominionism (missional, evangelistic, but often disproportionally focused on invisible spiritual dominion through prayer warfare)

Economic Dominionism (missional, evangelistic, but often disproportionally focused on economic dominionism)

Political Dominionism (missional, evangelistic, but often disproportionally focused on influencing politics, culture, society. May even shift emphasis from individual discipleship to national discipleship)

Absolute Dominionism (actively pursuing complete triumph of the Church in every sphere of influence, including government, law, military. Dominion mandate extends beyond animals to include all of mankind) (Crusader Christianity, the anti-Gospel)

4 Comments
  • Pingback:The Millennium | All Along the Watchtower
    Posted at 16:41h, 03 October

    […] view points. A third is Joel Richardson’s article on Dominionism, which can be found here: https://joelstrumpet.com/?p=2505. Lastly, there is David Pawson’s book When Jesus Returns – this is an informative read, but […]

  • Larry Njihia
    Posted at 05:58h, 18 September

    Thank you for this well written article that answers most if not all of the questions I had on Christian Dominionism.
    I knew from the New Testament that the mission of the Church is not to take over the world for Christ, but I didn’t clearly see the implication and logical conclusion of this view.
    On the other hand I have been challenged not to neglect my role as a steward and ambassador for Christ. That I am to have a balanced view of pilgrim and steward identities for even though this world is not my home, I am called to be the salt of the earth and the light of the world.
    I realize also that the dual worldview has influenced my thinking more than I care to admit. I hope you have more articles on this topic and how they impact our eschatology.

  • Staci Landis
    Posted at 15:50h, 30 January

    Hi Joel! I’ve been following you for some time and recently watched the latest film by yourself and Dalton Thomas. A few months ago, Dalton posted a repost of something posted by Mike Bickle. A known proponent of dominion type theology. I private messaged them and they said they fully support Mike Bickle. But you seem to state here that you are staunchly opposed to Dominion theology. Is it possible to align yourself with Dalton Thomas who supports Dominionism views?
    Thank you for your response!

  • Joel
    Posted at 15:14h, 06 February

    Mike Bickle doesn’t support Dominion Theology at all. Another name for Dominion Theology is Postmillennialism. Mike is one of the most ardent Premillennialists out there. Biblical speaking it is important to et your facts straight before making false accusations.

Post A Comment